Product Launch

Product Launch Excellence: 6 Mistakes Even Pros Make

$\"Thomas$

1 January 2024 · Updated 2 July 2026 · 5 min read

$\"Product$

Even the most capable companies get product launches wrong, and they tend to get them wrong in the same six specific ways. Naming the mechanism behind each failure is more useful than a generic launch checklist, because it shows exactly where the decision went wrong, not just that it did.

1. Misreading the market

A technologically sound product still fails if it ignores where the market actually stands.

Microsoft Zune (2006). Technically competent, but launched into a market where Apple’s iPod had already become deeply embedded in consumer habit and ecosystem. Zune offered nothing distinct enough to shift loyal iPod users. It was discontinued in 2011.

Crystal Pepsi (1990s). Marketed as a clear cola alternative, but consumers expected a clear drink to taste like lemon-lime rather than cola. PepsiCo overestimated appetite for novelty without checking whether the novelty made sense to the people buying it.

Google Glass (2013). Technologically ahead of its time, but Google underestimated public concern about privacy and the social awkwardness of a wearable camera, at a price point that made the risk harder to justify. The consumer version was discontinued.

2. Launching without a clear objective

Without a defined objective, a launch has no way to measure success or keep a team aligned.

Yahoo’s Tumblr acquisition (2013). Bought for $1.1 billion with no clear post-acquisition objective: was it a social platform, a blogging tool, or an advertising asset?

The ambiguity led to decisions (aggressive ad placement, in particular) that alienated the existing user base, and Yahoo wrote down Tumblr’s value by hundreds of millions of dollars in the years that followed.

HP TouchPad (2011). Launched to compete with the iPad without a clear position: premium competitor or niche alternative. The resulting mixed marketing and inconsistent pricing led to discontinuation just 49 days after launch.

New Coke (1985). Coca-Cola changed a decades-old formula without a clear objective, better taste, brand refresh, or competitive response, and the muddled reasoning showed. Consumer backlash forced a return to the original formula within months.

3. Overhyping the product

Genuine pre-launch anticipation is valuable. A gap between the hype and the delivered product is not.

Segway (2001). Promoted as being to the car what the car was to the horse and buggy. The actual product was an innovation but never came close to that framing, and the public reaction reflected the gap between promise and delivery.

No Man’s Sky (2016). Promoted with an expansive universe and deep multiplayer interaction that weren’t present at launch. The disparity between marketing and gameplay produced significant, lasting backlash.

Fyre Festival (2017). Marketed as a luxury festival experience with celebrity endorsement and premium pricing. Attendees found inadequate infrastructure and no basic provisions. The distance between the marketing and the reality led to public outrage and legal action.

4. Treating launch day as the finish line

A launch is the beginning of a product’s public life, not the end of the marketing effort.

BlackBerry PlayBook (2011). Shipped without native email, calendar, or contacts, unusual omissions for a brand built on business productivity. Promised fixes arrived slowly, and the delay damaged the product’s reputation more than the original gap would have on its own.

Windows 8 (2012). Introduced a touch-first interface with a steep learning curve and no Start button. Microsoft was slow to respond to the backlash, and it took until Windows 8.1, a full year later, to address the core complaints.

Snap Spectacles (2016). Strong initial buzz from limited-release vending machines, followed by a wide launch with no sustained post-launch strategy. Snap overestimated ongoing demand and was left with large unsold inventory.

5. Underestimating technical risk

Internal testing rarely surfaces every problem a real-world audience will find at scale.

Apple Maps (2012). Replaced Google Maps on iOS with a service that had misplaced landmarks, distorted imagery, and incorrect directions from launch. It took multiple updates and several years to reach the standard users expected.

Samsung Galaxy Note 7 (2016). A battery fault caused devices to catch fire shortly after release, forcing a full recall, discontinuation, and years of work to rebuild consumer trust.

SimCity (2013). Required a constant online connection even in single-player mode, and launch-day servers couldn’t handle demand, locking paying customers out of a game they already owned.

6. Failing to engage the audience

A launch that talks at its audience instead of listening to it risks a reaction it didn’t anticipate.

Gap’s logo redesign (2010). A new logo was introduced with no meaningful audience engagement beforehand. The backlash was immediate, and Gap reverted to the original design within a week.

EA’s Star Wars Battlefront II (2017). A microtransaction system widely seen as pay-to-win generated backlash serious enough to prompt public discussion of the ethics of in-game purchases. EA overhauled the progression and monetisation systems in response.

Tropicana’s packaging redesign (2009). A full packaging redesign, intended as a refresh, was unrecognisable to loyal customers. Sales fell 20% over two months, and the company reverted to the original design.

What these six mistakes have in common

None of these were failures of resources or ambition. Zune, Google Glass, and Apple Maps came from companies with more resources than almost anyone launching a product today.

Each failure traces back to a specific, nameable decision: misjudging the market, an unclear objective, a promise the product couldn’t keep, an under-resourced post-launch phase, unresolved technical risk, or a launch that didn’t listen. Naming the mechanism is the first step in avoiding it.

The takeaway

Product launch excellence isn’t a single skill. It’s the discipline of avoiding six specific, well-documented failure modes, each of which has already happened to a company with more resources than most. Understanding the mechanism behind each one is worth more than any generic launch checklist.

$\"Thomas$

Written by

Thomas Howcroft

Founder | Director

Engineering-led realism · Campaign-ready visuals · Senior client partner

FAQ

Common questions, answered.

What is the most common reason experienced companies still get product launches wrong?

Misjudging the market rather than the product itself. Microsoft Zune and Google Glass were both technologically sound, but each underestimated an entrenched competitor or a genuine public concern that no amount of engineering quality could offset.

Why does overhyping a product before launch cause more damage than under-promoting it?

Because the gap between promise and delivery becomes the story. Fyre Festival and No Man's Sky both generated enormous pre-launch attention, then converted that same attention into backlash when the product didn't match the marketing.

How much does post-launch response matter compared to the launch itself?

Often more. BlackBerry's PlayBook and Windows 8 both shipped with real, fixable problems, but slow post-launch response turned a rough start into lasting reputational damage that a faster fix would have avoided.

Keep reading

Related from the studio.

$\"Product$

1 May 2023

Why Should Marketers Use Product Rendering?

→

$\"3D$

1 May 2023

3D Rendering for Marketing: 5 Tips That Actually Ship

→

$\"3D$

1 May 2023

How Can You Use 3D Visualisation for Marketing Purposes?

→

Start the conversation

Got a product worth showing? Let’s talk about what it needs to do.

We reply to every brief personally, usually within one working day.

Discuss your brief